Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOTX vs RPMGX
PNOTX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts PNOTX vs RPMGX
Putnam Sustainable Future R6
Price$21.76
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets377.88M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.19
Change+$0.29 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.08B
PNOTX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOTX vs. RPMGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOTX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. PNOTX (378M). PNOTX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNOTX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: PNOTX (7 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). RPMGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than PNOTX (0.66). PNOTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). PNOTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: PNOTX (0) vs RPMGX (2500). PNOTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.09 vs. RPMGX (-7.46). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -4.20 vs. PNOTX (-14.09).
| PNOTX | RPMGX | PNOTX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.75 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.75 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.682 | 2.467 | 230% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 378M | 26.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.09 | -7.46 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.97 | 18.94 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.09 | -4.20 | 336% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement