Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOTX vs RPMGX
PNOTX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts PNOTX vs RPMGX
Putnam Sustainable Future R6
Price$21.27
Change-$0.17 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets373.86M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$101.43
Change-$0.74 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.84B
PNOTX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOTX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOTX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.8B vs. PNOTX (374M). PNOTX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . PNOTX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: PNOTX (7 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). RPMGX (0.75) is less costly to investors than PNOTX (0.68). PNOTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). PNOTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: PNOTX (0) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.48 vs. PNOTX (-8.16). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 2.31 vs. PNOTX (-8.75).
| PNOTX | RPMGX | PNOTX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.75 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.75 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.303 | 1.705 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 26.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.16 | -7.48 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.03 | 20.95 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.75 | 2.31 | -379% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers