Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNORX vs RGACX
PNORX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PNORX vs RGACX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R
Price$127.14
Change+$0.42 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.77B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.93
Change-$0.02 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
PNORX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNORX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNORX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. PNORX (6.77B). PNORX pays higher dividends than RGACX: PNORX (0.24) vs RGACX (0.07). PNORX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PNORX (23 years) vs RGACX (24 years). PNORX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNORX (22.00). PNORX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PNORX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. PNORX (-0.75). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. PNORX (15.14).
| PNORX | RGACX | PNORX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.94 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.94 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.933 | 19.364 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.77B | 341B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.07 | 353% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.75 | 8.31 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.48 | 63.31 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.14 | 37.90 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.35 | 98.36 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement