Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOPX vs RGAHX
PNOPX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts PNOPX vs RGAHX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$123.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.68B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
PNOPX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOPX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOPX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PNOPX (6.68B). RGAHX (0.44) and PNOPX (0.43) have matching dividends . PNOPX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: PNOPX (35 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). PNOPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). PNOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: PNOPX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.91 vs. PNOPX (-1.84). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 23.08 vs. PNOPX (11.90).
| PNOPX | RGAHX | PNOPX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.44 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.44 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.817 | 9.109 | 9% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.68B | 339B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.44 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.84 | 5.91 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.66 | 67.08 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.90 | 23.08 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.69 | 94.58 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement