Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOPX vs RGAFX
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PNOPX vs RGAFX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$123.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.68B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$81.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOPX vs. RGAFX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOPX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PNOPX (6.68B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PNOPX: RGAFX (0.53) vs PNOPX (0.43). PNOPX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PNOPX (35 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). PNOPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). PNOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: PNOPX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. PNOPX (-1.84). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.03 vs. PNOPX (11.90).
| PNOPX | RGAFX | PNOPX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.34 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.34 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.817 | 9.285 | 9% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.68B | 339B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.53 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.84 | 6.08 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.66 | 68.01 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.90 | 24.03 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.69 | 97.51 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers