Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOPX vs RGAFX
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PNOPX vs RGAFX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$133.81
Change-$2.30 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.65B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$87.34
Change-$1.95 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOPX vs. RGAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOPX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PNOPX (6.65B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PNOPX: RGAFX (0.52) vs PNOPX (0.43). PNOPX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PNOPX (35 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). PNOPX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: PNOPX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.22 vs. PNOPX (0.01). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.72 vs. PNOPX (18.92).
| PNOPX | RGAFX | PNOPX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.34 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.34 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.174 | 19.981 | 56% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.65B | 340B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.52 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.01 | 9.22 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.03 | 66.11 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.92 | 41.72 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.42 | 104.95 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement