Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOPX vs RGAFX
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PNOPX vs RGAFX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$119.55
Change-$12.62 (-9.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.55B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$79.62
Change-$9.66 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOPX vs. RGAFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOPX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PNOPX (6.55B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PNOPX: RGAFX (0.50) vs PNOPX (0.00). PNOPX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PNOPX (35 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). PNOPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). PNOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: PNOPX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.03 vs. PNOPX (-4.48). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.93 vs. PNOPX (4.03).
| PNOPX | RGAFX | PNOPX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.34 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.34 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.080 | -0.995 | 209% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.55B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.48 | 3.03 | -148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.78 | 46.30 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.03 | 14.93 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.29 | 122.97 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers