Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOPX vs RGAFX
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PNOPX vs RGAFX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$132.24
Change+$1.01 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.56B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$89.09
Change+$1.12 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
PNOPX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOPX vs. RGAFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOPX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. PNOPX (6.56B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PNOPX: RGAFX (0.53) vs PNOPX (0.44). PNOPX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PNOPX (35 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). PNOPX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: PNOPX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.75 vs. PNOPX (-3.00). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. PNOPX (19.57).
| PNOPX | RGAFX | PNOPX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.34 | 256% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.34 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.013 | 19.712 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.56B | 337B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.53 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.00 | 12.75 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.70 | 74.24 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.57 | 45.63 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.93 | 101.58 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement