Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOPX vs RGACX
PNOPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PNOPX vs RGACX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$129.63
Change+$0.48 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.49B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.66B
PNOPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOPX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOPX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PNOPX (6.49B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than RGACX: PNOPX (0.46) vs RGACX (0.07). PNOPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PNOPX (35 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.87). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PNOPX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. PNOPX (-3.43). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. PNOPX (22.75).
| PNOPX | RGACX | PNOPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.881 | 17.183 | 34% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.49B | 336B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.07 | 642% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.43 | 12.22 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.42 | 71.26 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.75 | 45.63 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.70 | 111.15 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement