Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOPX vs RGACX
PNOPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PNOPX vs RGACX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$127.78
Change-$0.23 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.47B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
PNOPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOPX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. PNOPX (6.47B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than RGACX: PNOPX (0.46) vs RGACX (0.07). PNOPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PNOPX (35 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.87). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PNOPX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. PNOPX (-0.10). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. PNOPX (17.95).
| PNOPX | RGACX | PNOPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.94 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.370 | 15.516 | 28% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.47B | 332B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.07 | 642% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.10 | 17.83 | -1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.14 | 58.53 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.95 | 40.02 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.73 | 95.93 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers