Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNOCX vs RGACX
PNOCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PNOCX vs RGACX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$80.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
PNOCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNOCX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNOCX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. PNOCX (6.7B). RGACX pays higher dividends than PNOCX: RGACX (0.07) vs PNOCX (0.02). PNOCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PNOCX (26 years) vs RGACX (24 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). PNOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: PNOCX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. PNOCX (-7.46). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.41 vs. PNOCX (-7.63).
| PNOCX | RGACX | PNOCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.93 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.93 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.942 | 8.807 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.7B | 339B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.07 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.46 | 5.61 | -133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.06 | 64.57 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.63 | 20.41 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.40 | 90.45 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement