Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PNGAX vs TRIGX
PNGAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts PNGAX vs TRIGX
Putnam International Value A
Price$17.05
Change+$0.18 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets932.53M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.73
Change+$0.18 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.35B
PNGAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PNGAX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNGAX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. PNGAX (933M). PNGAX (2.03) and TRIGX (1.96) have matching dividends . PNGAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: PNGAX (29 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). PNGAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). PNGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). PNGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: PNGAX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.30 vs. PNGAX (17.33). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 112.06 vs. PNGAX (97.21).
| PNGAX | TRIGX | PNGAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.87 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.87 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.167 | 33.785 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 933M | 16.4B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.96 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.33 | 23.30 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.95 | 107.23 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.21 | 112.06 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.72 | 114.17 | 90% |