PNFP
Price
$114.21
Change
-$4.07 (-3.44%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.62B
57 days until earnings call
UMBF
Price
$106.91
Change
-$3.05 (-2.77%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PNFP vs UMBF

Header iconPNFP vs UMBF Comparison
Open Charts PNFP vs UMBFBanner chart's image
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$114.21
Change-$4.07 (-3.44%)
Volume$304.71K
Capitalization6.62B
UMB Financial
Price$106.91
Change-$3.05 (-2.77%)
Volume$467.8K
Capitalization4.12B
PNFP vs UMBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PNFP vs. UMBF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNFP is a Hold and UMBF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (PNFP: $121.91 vs. UMBF: $113.93)
Brand notoriety: PNFP and UMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PNFP: 130% vs. UMBF: 74%
Market capitalization -- PNFP: $6.62B vs. UMBF: $4.12B
PNFP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.62B. UMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PNFP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUMBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PNFP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UMBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PNFP and UMBF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PNFP’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PNFP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UMBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the short-term than UMBF.

Price Growth

PNFP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.21% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2025.

UMBF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($6.62B) has a higher market cap than UMBF($4.12B). UMBF (11.78) and PNFP (11.70) have similar P/E ratio . PNFP YTD gains are higher at: 6.777 vs. UMBF (0.948). UMBF has more cash in the bank: 447M vs. PNFP (229M). UMBF has less debt than PNFP: UMBF (1.38B) vs PNFP (2.56B). PNFP (1.38B) and UMBF (1.33B) have equivalent revenues.
PNFPUMBFPNFP / UMBF
Capitalization6.62B4.12B161%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.7770.948715%
P/E Ratio11.7011.7899%
Revenue1.38B1.33B104%
Total Cash229M447M51%
Total Debt2.56B1.38B185%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PNFP vs UMBF: Fundamental Ratings
PNFP
UMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2663
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3233
SMR RATING
1..100
1011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1140
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNFP's Valuation (90) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (93). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (33). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (11). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (50). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UMBF (40). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PNFPUMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
+1.39%
UBSI - PNFP
88%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
SSB - PNFP
88%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
HWC - PNFP
88%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
IBOC - PNFP
88%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
ABCB - PNFP
87%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
More

UMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMBF has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMBF jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMBF
1D Price
Change %
UMBF100%
+1.85%
UBSI - UMBF
85%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
HOPE - UMBF
83%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
FNB - UMBF
83%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
HWC - UMBF
83%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
PNFP - UMBF
83%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
More