PNFP
Price
$112.63
Change
+$0.39 (+0.35%)
Updated
Dec 23, 11:03 AM (EDT)
29 days until earnings call
RF
Price
$23.67
Change
-$0.10 (-0.42%)
Updated
Dec 23, 11:17 AM (EDT)
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PNFP vs RF

Header iconPNFP vs RF Comparison
Open Charts PNFP vs RFBanner chart's image
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$112.63
Change+$0.39 (+0.35%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Regions Financial
Price$23.67
Change-$0.10 (-0.42%)
Volume$2.52K
CapitalizationN/A
PNFP vs RF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PNFP vs. RF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNFP is a Hold and RF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (PNFP: $112.24 vs. RF: $23.77)
Brand notoriety: PNFP: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PNFP: 254% vs. RF: 355%
Market capitalization -- PNFP: $6.62B vs. RF: $18.9B
PNFP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.62B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PNFP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PNFP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PNFP and RF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PNFP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PNFP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the short-term than RF.

Price Growth

PNFP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.64% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($18.9B) has a higher market cap than PNFP($6.62B). PNFP has higher P/E ratio than RF: PNFP (11.70) vs RF (9.74). PNFP YTD gains are higher at: 29.951 vs. RF (28.353). RF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. PNFP (229M). RF has less debt than PNFP: RF (2.33B) vs PNFP (2.56B). RF has higher revenues than PNFP: RF (7.57B) vs PNFP (1.38B).
PNFPRFPNFP / RF
Capitalization6.62B18.9B35%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.95128.353106%
P/E Ratio11.709.74120%
Revenue1.38B7.57B18%
Total Cash229M1.55B15%
Total Debt2.56B2.33B110%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PNFP vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
PNFP
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3528
SMR RATING
1..100
107
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1119
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (77) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (90) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (35) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (10) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (47) in the Major Banks industry. This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as RF (19) in the Major Banks industry. This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PNFPRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
+1.16%
HWC - PNFP
88%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
SSB - PNFP
88%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
SNV - PNFP
87%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
ZION - PNFP
87%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
ONB - PNFP
87%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+2.59%
HBAN - RF
89%
Closely correlated
+2.58%
CFG - RF
88%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
PNFP - RF
87%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
HWC - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
MTB - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
More