It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PNC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PNC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
PNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.76% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.53%.
PNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
PNC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PNC | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 46% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 62% | 10 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BMAY | 44.90 | 0.10 | +0.22% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™- May | |||
| EMM | 33.75 | 0.06 | +0.16% |
| Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | |||
| PEO | 21.69 | N/A | N/A |
| Adams Natural Resources Fund | |||
| FSGS | 31.03 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF | |||
| SPTL | 26.59 | -0.04 | -0.15% |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio L/T Trs ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNC has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNC jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNC | 100% | +0.19% | ||
| HBAN - PNC | 91% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MTB - PNC | 91% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| USB - PNC | 90% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| FITB - PNC | 90% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| TFC - PNC | 89% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULVM has been closely correlated with TFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ULVM jumps, then TFC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ULVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ULVM | 100% | N/A | ||
| TFC - ULVM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| CE - ULVM | 73% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| TRMB - ULVM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| PNC - ULVM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| BLK - ULVM | 71% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||