Advertisement
PNAGF vs PPAAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PNAGF is a Hold and PPAAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PNAGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePPAAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- PNAGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PPAAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PNAGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- PNAGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PNAGF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PPAAF (@Gas Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.72%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.09%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Integrated Oil (+0.56% weekly)Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
@Gas Distributors (+0.36% weekly)Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.
| PNAGF | PPAAF | PNAGF / PPAAF | |
| Capitalization | 8.75B | 2.5B | 349% |
| EBITDA | 3.65B | 577M | 632% |
| Gain YTD | 8.247 | 40.000 | 21% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.99 | 8.75 | 217% |
| Revenue | 6.51B | 3.81B | 171% |
| Total Cash | 2.56B | 1.55B | 165% |
| Total Debt | 1.84B | 1.29B | 142% |
PNAGF | PPAAF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 27 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PPAAF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PNAGF (93). This means that PPAAF’s stock grew significantly faster than PNAGF’s over the last 12 months.
PNAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as PPAAF (76). This means that PNAGF’s stock grew similarly to PPAAF’s over the last 12 months.
PNAGF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as PPAAF (70). This means that PNAGF’s stock grew similarly to PPAAF’s over the last 12 months.
PPAAF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as PNAGF (55). This means that PPAAF’s stock grew similarly to PNAGF’s over the last 12 months.
PPAAF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as PNAGF (49). This means that PPAAF’s stock grew similarly to PNAGF’s over the last 12 months.
| PNAGF | PPAAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 11% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 24% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 18% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 18% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 13% | 4 days ago 30% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 22% | 4 days ago 25% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 20% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FSKAX | 175.31 | 1.16 | +0.67% |
| Fidelity Total Market Index | |||
| GQEPX | 21.66 | 0.11 | +0.51% |
| GQG Partners US Select Quality Eq Inv | |||
| HMVRX | 16.71 | 0.03 | +0.18% |
| Hartford MidCap Value R3 | |||
| AEDCX | 32.01 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| Invesco EQV European Equity C | |||
| TPYAX | 9.12 | -0.05 | -0.55% |
| Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq A | |||
PNAGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PNAGF and ENGGY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNAGF and ENGGY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNAGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNAGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ENGGY - PNAGF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| HOKCF - PNAGF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GASNY - PNAGF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
| GASNF - PNAGF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PPAAF - PNAGF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PPAAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PPAAF and OGS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PPAAF and OGS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PPAAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPAAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OGS - PPAAF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| ENGGY - PPAAF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| GAILF - PPAAF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HOKCF - PPAAF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PNAGF - PPAAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||