PMYLF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.03 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
40.97M
SRCGF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMYLF vs SRCGF

Header iconPMYLF vs SRCGF Comparison
Open Charts PMYLF vs SRCGFBanner chart's image
Boab Metals
Price$0.12
Change-$0.03 (-20.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization40.97M
HOMELAND NICKEL
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$209K
Capitalization12.98M
PMYLF vs SRCGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMYLF vs. SRCGF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMYLF is a Hold and SRCGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PMYLF: $0.12 vs. SRCGF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: PMYLF and SRCGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMYLF: 100% vs. SRCGF: 277%
Market capitalization -- PMYLF: $40.97M vs. SRCGF: $12.98M
PMYLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $40.97M. SRCGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $12.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMYLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMYLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRCGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRCGF is a better buy in the long-term than PMYLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRCGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SRCGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

PMYLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SRCGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.43% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMYLF($41M) has a higher market cap than SRCGF($13M). SRCGF YTD gains are higher at: 328.000 vs. PMYLF (-20.000). SRCGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.89M vs. PMYLF (-3.14M). PMYLF has higher revenues than SRCGF: PMYLF (91.4K) vs SRCGF (0).
PMYLFSRCGFPMYLF / SRCGF
Capitalization41M13M315%
EBITDA-3.14M-1.89M166%
Gain YTD-20.000328.000-6%
P/E RatioN/A1.26-
Revenue91.4K0-
Total CashN/A3.82M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRCGF: Fundamental Ratings
SRCGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMYLFSRCGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMRAF15.451.29
+9.11%
Tomra Systems A/S/A
HFBK39.331.54
+4.08%
Harford Bank
PSKOF23.50N/A
N/A
ORLEN SA
ABBB8.67N/A
N/A
Auburn Bancorp, Inc.
BPMUF67.75N/A
N/A
Basilea Pharmaceutica AG

PMYLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMYLF has been loosely correlated with WTRNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMYLF jumps, then WTRNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMYLF
1D Price
Change %
PMYLF100%
N/A
WTRNF - PMYLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LAC - PMYLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
SRCGF - PMYLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.40%
HPQFF - PMYLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
NAK - PMYLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More

SRCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRCGF and WTRNF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRCGF and WTRNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCGF
1D Price
Change %
SRCGF100%
-5.40%
WTRNF - SRCGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMYLF - SRCGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADBRF - SRCGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
SXOOF - SRCGF
8%
Poorly correlated
-12.63%
NILIF - SRCGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
More