Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMYCX vs VTSMX
PMYCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts PMYCX vs VTSMX
Putnam Core Equity Fund C
Price$46.85
Change+$0.22 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.08B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$163.76
Change+$0.68 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
PMYCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMYCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMYCX is a StrongBuy and VTSMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. PMYCX (6.08B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than PMYCX: VTSMX (1.02) vs PMYCX (0.00). PMYCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: PMYCX (15 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). PMYCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). PMYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 11.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). PMYCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: PMYCX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. PMYCX (7.32). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 77.17 vs. PMYCX (64.70).
| PMYCX | VTSMX | PMYCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.14 | 1,214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.14 | 1,214% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.920 | 15.489 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.08B | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.32 | 11.43 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.52 | 64.40 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.70 | 77.17 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.28 | 223.01 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement