PMTS
Price
$14.19
Change
+$0.47 (+3.43%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
156.24M
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SEZL
Price
$69.35
Change
-$4.88 (-6.57%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.54B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMTS vs SEZL

Header iconPMTS vs SEZL Comparison
Open Charts PMTS vs SEZLBanner chart's image
CPI Card Group
Price$14.19
Change+$0.47 (+3.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization156.24M
Sezzle
Price$69.35
Change-$4.88 (-6.57%)
Volume$13.95K
Capitalization2.54B
PMTS vs SEZL Comparison Chart in %
PMTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SEZL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMTS vs. SEZL commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMTS is a Hold and SEZL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (PMTS: $13.72 vs. SEZL: $74.23)
Brand notoriety: PMTS and SEZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMTS: 82% vs. SEZL: 86%
Market capitalization -- PMTS: $158.74M vs. SEZL: $2.37B
PMTS [@Savings Banks] is valued at $158.74M. SEZL’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $2.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $631.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEZL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PMTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEZL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEZL is a better buy in the long-term than PMTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMTS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEZL’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMTS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SEZL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SEZL is a better buy in the short-term than PMTS.

Price Growth

PMTS (@Savings Banks) experienced а -0.36% price change this week, while SEZL (@Savings Banks) price change was -2.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

PMTS is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

SEZL is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.54% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEZL($2.54B) has a higher market cap than PMTS($156M). SEZL has higher P/E ratio than PMTS: SEZL (22.85) vs PMTS (11.43). SEZL YTD gains are higher at: 16.944 vs. PMTS (-6.540). SEZL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 140M vs. PMTS (75.7M). SEZL has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. PMTS (16M). SEZL has less debt than PMTS: SEZL (118M) vs PMTS (321M). PMTS has higher revenues than SEZL: PMTS (516M) vs SEZL (419M).
PMTSSEZLPMTS / SEZL
Capitalization156M2.54B6%
EBITDA75.7M140M54%
Gain YTD-6.54016.944-39%
P/E Ratio11.4322.8550%
Revenue516M419M123%
Total Cash16M104M15%
Total Debt321M118M272%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMTS: Fundamental Ratings
PMTS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
51
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
22

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMTSSEZL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SEZL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KVALX13.380.08
+0.60%
Kennedy Capital Small Cap Value Instl
ATGDX14.11-0.04
-0.28%
American Century International Gr R6
QGIAX24.67-0.10
-0.40%
Pear Tree Quality Institutional
IAXAX8.04-0.05
-0.62%
VY® T. Rowe Price Divers Mid Cap Gr A
LGRRX29.39-0.40
-1.34%
Loomis Sayles Growth A

PMTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMTS has been loosely correlated with SEZL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMTS jumps, then SEZL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMTS
1D Price
Change %
PMTS100%
+0.73%
SEZL - PMTS
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.66%
VSTS - PMTS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
OMF - PMTS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
R - PMTS
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
AL - PMTS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
More

SEZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEZL has been loosely correlated with UPST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEZL jumps, then UPST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEZL
1D Price
Change %
SEZL100%
-2.66%
UPST - SEZL
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
PMTS - SEZL
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
SOFI - SEZL
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
OMF - SEZL
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
AXP - SEZL
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More