Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMPCX vs RRMGX
PMPCX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts PMPCX vs RRMGX
Putnam Sustainable Future C
Price$13.02
Change-$3.61 (-21.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets334.38M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$84.36
Change-$5.84 (-6.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
PMPCX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMPCX vs. RRMGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMPCX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. PMPCX (334M). PMPCX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMPCX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: PMPCX (25 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). PMPCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). PMPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). PMPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: PMPCX (0) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.22 vs. PMPCX (-22.36). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -21.55 vs. PMPCX (-42.94).
| PMPCX | RRMGX | PMPCX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.29 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.29 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.769 | -0.189 | 1,991% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 334M | 25.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.36 | -7.22 | 310% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.82 | -4.10 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.94 | -21.55 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.95 | 37.39 | -29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement