Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMPCX vs RRMGX
PMPCX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts PMPCX vs RRMGX
Putnam Sustainable Future C
Price$15.36
Change-$0.26 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets369.23M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$85.92
Change-$1.25 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.18B
PMPCX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMPCX vs. RRMGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMPCX is a StrongBuy and RRMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. PMPCX (369M). PMPCX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMPCX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: PMPCX (24 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). PMPCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). PMPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). PMPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: PMPCX (0) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.73 vs. PMPCX (-13.37). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : 1.89 vs. PMPCX (-9.91).
| PMPCX | RRMGX | PMPCX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.29 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.29 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.538 | -2.275 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 369M | 27.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.37 | -6.73 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.68 | 9.38 | 263% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.91 | 1.89 | -526% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.92 | 9.49 | -178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement