PMMCF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.08M
TMASF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.09M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMMCF vs TMASF

Header iconPMMCF vs TMASF Comparison
Open Charts PMMCF vs TMASFBanner chart's image
Pampa Metals
Price$0.17
Change+$0.01 (+6.25%)
Volume$149.6K
Capitalization1.08M
Temas Resources
Price$0.19
Change-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Volume$1.01K
Capitalization9.09M
PMMCF vs TMASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PMMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMMCF vs. TMASF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMMCF is a Buy and TMASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PMMCF: $0.17 vs. TMASF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: PMMCF and TMASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMMCF: 551% vs. TMASF: 3%
Market capitalization -- PMMCF: $1.08M vs. TMASF: $9.09M
PMMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.08M. TMASF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMASF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PMMCF and TMASF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMMCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMASF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMMCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TMASF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMMCF is a better buy in the short-term than TMASF.

Price Growth

PMMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +28.03% price change this week, while TMASF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMASF($9.09M) has a higher market cap than PMMCF($1.08M). TMASF YTD gains are higher at: 265.444 vs. PMMCF (53.636). PMMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -143.65K vs. TMASF (-3.47M). PMMCF has more cash in the bank: 3.48M vs. TMASF (57.7K). PMMCF has less debt than TMASF: PMMCF (10.6K) vs TMASF (61K). PMMCF (0) and TMASF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PMMCFTMASFPMMCF / TMASF
Capitalization1.08M9.09M12%
EBITDA-143.65K-3.47M4%
Gain YTD53.636265.44420%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.48M57.7K6,036%
Total Debt10.6K61K17%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMMCFTMASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERLFF1.550.02
+1.47%
Entree Resources Ltd.
APMCF0.24N/A
N/A
Morien Resources Corp.
CMSQF24.81N/A
N/A
Computershare Ltd.
EQGPF73.96N/A
N/A
EQB Inc
WGXRF1.85-0.06
-3.14%
Westgold Resources Limited

PMMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMMCF has been loosely correlated with SILEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMMCF jumps, then SILEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMMCF
1D Price
Change %
PMMCF100%
+6.29%
SILEF - PMMCF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LQRCF - PMMCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WWR - PMMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
EDDYF - PMMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.07%
LBSR - PMMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
More

TMASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMASF and FSUMF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMASF and FSUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMASF
1D Price
Change %
TMASF100%
-6.15%
FSUMF - TMASF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
YORKF - TMASF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMMCF - TMASF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.29%
NVAAF - TMASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUIFF - TMASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More