PMMCF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
50.73M
TMASF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMMCF vs TMASF

Header iconPMMCF vs TMASF Comparison
Open Charts PMMCF vs TMASFBanner chart's image
Andina Copper
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization50.73M
Temas Resources
Price$0.19
Change-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Volume$15.01K
Capitalization7.41M
PMMCF vs TMASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PMMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMMCF vs. TMASF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMMCF is a Hold and TMASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (PMMCF: $0.23 vs. TMASF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: PMMCF and TMASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMMCF: 34% vs. TMASF: 122%
Market capitalization -- PMMCF: $50.73M vs. TMASF: $7.41M
PMMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $50.73M. TMASF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTMASF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TMASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMASF is a better buy in the long-term than PMMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMMCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMASF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TMASF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PMMCF and TMASF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PMMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +13.50% price change this week, while TMASF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +6.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMMCF($50.7M) has a higher market cap than TMASF($7.41M). TMASF YTD gains are higher at: 269.382 vs. PMMCF (109.455). PMMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -967.41K vs. TMASF (-1.58M). PMMCF has more cash in the bank: 208K vs. TMASF (17.8K). PMMCF (0) and TMASF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PMMCFTMASFPMMCF / TMASF
Capitalization50.7M7.41M684%
EBITDA-967.41K-1.58M61%
Gain YTD109.455269.38241%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash208K17.8K1,169%
Total DebtN/A120K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMMCFTMASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
83%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HDLMY45.890.84
+1.86%
HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG
AKAAF78.00N/A
N/A
Aker AS
BCTF13.36-0.04
-0.30%
Bancorp 34, Inc.
LNZNF30.00-0.30
-0.99%
Lenzing AG
EGLXF0.05N/A
-1.41%
Enthusiast Gaming Holdings Inc

PMMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMMCF has been loosely correlated with SILEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMMCF jumps, then SILEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMMCF
1D Price
Change %
PMMCF100%
-4.44%
SILEF - PMMCF
36%
Loosely correlated
+10.17%
LQRCF - PMMCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+8.14%
WWR - PMMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDDYF - PMMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LBSR - PMMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+20.45%
More

TMASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMASF and FSUMF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMASF and FSUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMASF
1D Price
Change %
TMASF100%
-3.36%
FSUMF - TMASF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
YORKF - TMASF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
PMMCF - TMASF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.44%
NVAAF - TMASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUIFF - TMASF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More