PMMCF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
38.97M
SVMLF
Price
$0.48
Change
+$0.01 (+2.13%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
291.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMMCF vs SVMLF

Header iconPMMCF vs SVMLF Comparison
Open Charts PMMCF vs SVMLFBanner chart's image
Andina Copper
Price$0.19
Change-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Volume$375
Capitalization38.97M
Sovereign Metals
Price$0.48
Change+$0.01 (+2.13%)
Volume$13.57K
Capitalization291.12M
PMMCF vs SVMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PMMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMMCF vs. SVMLF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMMCF is a Hold and SVMLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (PMMCF: $0.19 vs. SVMLF: $0.48)
Brand notoriety: PMMCF and SVMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMMCF: 1% vs. SVMLF: 12%
Market capitalization -- PMMCF: $38.97M vs. SVMLF: $291.12M
PMMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $38.97M. SVMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $291.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMMCF is a better buy in the long-term than SVMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMMCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVMLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMMCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVMLF is a better buy in the short-term than PMMCF.

Price Growth

PMMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.17% price change this week, while SVMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.50% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVMLF($291M) has a higher market cap than PMMCF($39M). PMMCF YTD gains are higher at: 72.727 vs. SVMLF (6.015). PMMCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.29M vs. SVMLF (-33.22M).
PMMCFSVMLFPMMCF / SVMLF
Capitalization39M291M13%
EBITDA-1.29M-33.22M4%
Gain YTD72.7276.0151,209%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash814KN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMMCFSVMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPNFF0.140.01
+5.41%
Euro Sun Mining Inc.
FNTTF0.26N/A
N/A
XR IMMERSIVE TECH INC.
ACOPF5.70N/A
N/A
A2 Milk Co Ltd.
HUTCY1.91N/A
N/A
Hutchison Telecommunications Hong Kong Holdings Ltd.
CAPMF147.12-0.66
-0.45%
Capgemini SE

PMMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMMCF has been loosely correlated with SILEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMMCF jumps, then SILEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMMCF
1D Price
Change %
PMMCF100%
N/A
SILEF - PMMCF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
LQRCF - PMMCF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
WWR - PMMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.16%
EDDYF - PMMCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LBSR - PMMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
More

SVMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVMLF and VRRCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVMLF and VRRCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVMLF
1D Price
Change %
SVMLF100%
+2.38%
VRRCF - SVMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
PMMCF - SVMLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
METOF - SVMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.63%
ELMTF - SVMLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DETRF - SVMLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More