Advertisement
PMMAF vs SMSEY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMMAF is a Hold and SMSEY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PMMAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PMMAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SMSEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PMMAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMSEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PMMAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SMSEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
PMMAF (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а -0.58% price change this week, while SMSEY (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +2.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
PMMAF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wholesale Distributors (+0.66% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
| PMMAF | SMSEY | PMMAF / SMSEY | |
| Capitalization | 2.88B | 3.4B | 85% |
| EBITDA | 377M | 843M | 45% |
| Gain YTD | -57.744 | -18.855 | 306% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.66 | 11.67 | 126% |
| Revenue | 8.62B | 3.59B | 240% |
| Total Cash | 293M | 658M | 45% |
| Total Debt | 2.58B | 2.32B | 111% |
PMMAF | SMSEY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PMMAF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SMSEY (34). This means that PMMAF’s stock grew similarly to SMSEY’s over the last 12 months.
SMSEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMMAF (100). This means that SMSEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.
SMSEY's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as PMMAF (92). This means that SMSEY’s stock grew similarly to PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.
SMSEY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMMAF (88). This means that SMSEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.
SMSEY's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMMAF (89). This means that SMSEY’s stock grew significantly faster than PMMAF’s over the last 12 months.
| PMMAF | SMSEY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| APGZX | 125.20 | -0.02 | -0.02% |
| AB Large Cap Growth Z | |||
| LMVVX | 28.71 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value R5 | |||
| LGCAX | 20.21 | -0.03 | -0.15% |
| Lord Abbett Global Equity A | |||
| TBARX | 30.81 | -0.05 | -0.16% |
| Touchstone Balanced R6 | |||
| MASKX | 27.08 | -0.08 | -0.29% |
| iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Idx Instl | |||
PMMAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMMAF has been loosely correlated with PUMSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMMAF jumps, then PUMSY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PMMAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMMAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PUMSY - PMMAF | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| ADDYY - PMMAF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
| MONRY - PMMAF | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.34% | ||
| SMSEY - PMMAF | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
| MONRF - PMMAF | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.16% | ||
More | ||||
SMSEY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SMSEY and SMSOF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMSEY and SMSOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMSEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMSEY | 100% | -1.97% | ||
| SMSOF - SMSEY | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NKE - SMSEY | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.66% | ||
| ASCCY - SMSEY | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| MONRY - SMSEY | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.34% | ||
| MCRAA - SMSEY | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||