Advertisement
PMCUF vs QTGPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMCUF is a Hold and QTGPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PMCUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQTGPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- PMCUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QTGPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PMCUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTGPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PMCUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QTGPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
PMCUF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а -4.67% price change this week, while QTGPF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +69.27%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-3.34% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Packaged Software (-1.73% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| PMCUF | QTGPF | PMCUF / QTGPF | |
| Capitalization | 14.8B | 932M | 1,588% |
| EBITDA | 165M | 67M | 246% |
| Gain YTD | -6.090 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 185.89 | 19.41 | 958% |
| Revenue | 213M | 208M | 102% |
| Total Cash | 209M | 93.9M | 223% |
| Total Debt | 2.26M | 7.06M | 32% |
PMCUF | QTGPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 49 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QTGPF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMCUF (93). This means that QTGPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.
PMCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTGPF (90). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTGPF’s over the last 12 months.
PMCUF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as QTGPF (39). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew similarly to QTGPF’s over the last 12 months.
QTGPF's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (84). This means that QTGPF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.
PMCUF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as QTGPF (94). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew similarly to QTGPF’s over the last 12 months.
| PMCUF | QTGPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 22% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 32% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 31% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 33% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 51% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 31% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XHS | 109.68 | 0.50 | +0.46% |
| Stt Strt® SPDR® S&P®HlthCrSvcsETF | |||
| EELV | 27.98 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Vol ETF | |||
| UCON | 25.23 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| First Trust Smith Unconstrained Pl BdETF | |||
| RFEU | 76.24 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Eurp ETF | |||
| RITPF | 30.00 | N/A | N/A |
| RIT Capital Partners Plc. | |||
PMCUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCUF and OCLCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCUF and OCLCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PMCUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMCUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OCLCF - PMCUF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TMSNY - PMCUF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
| FSLY - PMCUF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| NEXXY - PMCUF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TMNSF - PMCUF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
QTGPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QTGPF and WWLNF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QTGPF and WWLNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTGPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTGPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WWLNF - QTGPF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PMCUF - QTGPF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ROIUF - QTGPF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ROWKF - QTGPF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RPMT - QTGPF | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.87% | ||
More | ||||