Advertisement
PMCUF vs PONGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMCUF is a StrongBuy and PONGF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PMCUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePONGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PMCUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PONGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PMCUF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PONGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PMCUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- PONGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
PMCUF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +9.92% price change this week, while PONGF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was +10.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -6.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.92%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-6.40% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Electronics/Appliances (-2.08% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| PMCUF | PONGF | PMCUF / PONGF | |
| Capitalization | 12.9B | 79.4M | 16,247% |
| EBITDA | 165M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.464 | 20.833 | -50% |
| P/E Ratio | 170.30 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 213M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 209M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.26M | N/A | - |
PMCUF | PONGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 1 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PMCUF's Valuation (92) in the null industry is in the same range as PONGF (97). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew similarly to PONGF’s over the last 12 months.
PMCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PONGF (100). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PONGF’s over the last 12 months.
PMCUF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PONGF (99). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than PONGF’s over the last 12 months.
PONGF's Price Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (84). This means that PONGF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.
PONGF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMCUF (94). This means that PONGF’s stock grew significantly faster than PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.
| PMCUF | PONGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 16 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | N/A |
Advertisement
PMCUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCUF and OCLCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCUF and OCLCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PMCUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMCUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OCLCF - PMCUF | 32% Poorly correlated | -30.04% | ||
| TMSNY - PMCUF | 29% Poorly correlated | -7.23% | ||
| FSLY - PMCUF | 29% Poorly correlated | -4.77% | ||
| NEXXY - PMCUF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TMNSF - PMCUF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PONGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PONGF and PRYNF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PONGF and PRYNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PONGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PONGF | 100% | +10.69% | ||
| PRYNF - PONGF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OVTZ - PONGF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PBSV - PONGF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PMCUF - PONGF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OTGLY - PONGF | 4% Poorly correlated | -5.38% | ||
More | ||||