PMCOF
Price
$0.89
Change
+$0.02 (+2.30%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
133.92M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PUCCF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.81M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMCOF vs PUCCF

Header iconPMCOF vs PUCCF Comparison
Open Charts PMCOF vs PUCCFBanner chart's image
PROSPECTOR METALS
Price$0.89
Change+$0.02 (+2.30%)
Volume$117.05K
Capitalization133.92M
CAROLINA RUSH
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$38.79K
Capitalization5.81M
PMCOF vs PUCCF Comparison Chart in %
PMCOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PUCCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMCOF vs. PUCCF commentary
Feb 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMCOF is a Hold and PUCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 09, 2026
Stock price -- (PMCOF: $0.89 vs. PUCCF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: PMCOF and PUCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMCOF: 61% vs. PUCCF: 93%
Market capitalization -- PMCOF: $133.92M vs. PUCCF: $5.81M
PMCOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $133.92M. PUCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $140.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMCOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePUCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMCOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PUCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PMCOF and PUCCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMCOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PUCCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMCOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PUCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMCOF is a better buy in the short-term than PUCCF.

Price Growth

PMCOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.77% price change this week, while PUCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -28.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +165.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +91.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+165.92% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCOF($134M) has a higher market cap than PUCCF($5.81M). PUCCF YTD gains are higher at: 3.842 vs. PMCOF (-1.504). PUCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.83M vs. PMCOF (-6.02M). PMCOF has more cash in the bank: 2.02M vs. PUCCF (143K). PUCCF has higher revenues than PMCOF: PUCCF (3.86K) vs PMCOF (0).
PMCOFPUCCFPMCOF / PUCCF
Capitalization134M5.81M2,307%
EBITDA-6.02M-1.83M329%
Gain YTD-1.5043.842-39%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue03.86K-
Total Cash2.02M143K1,413%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCOF vs PUCCF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCOF
PUCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3437
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PMCOF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (50). This means that PMCOF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (100). This means that PMCOF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCOF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (100). This means that PMCOF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCOF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (37). This means that PMCOF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCOF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PUCCF (100). This means that PMCOF’s stock grew similarly to PUCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMCOFPUCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMCOF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PUCCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WOOF2.620.14
+5.65%
Petco Health and Wellness Company
QTWO57.021.85
+3.35%
Q2 Holdings
FE46.630.08
+0.18%
FirstEnergy Corp
FGBI8.93-0.03
-0.33%
First Guaranty Bancshares
EVGN1.08-0.02
-1.82%
Evogene Ltd.

PMCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCOF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCOF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCOF
1D Price
Change %
PMCOF100%
+3.11%
GSISF - PMCOF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
WHGOF - PMCOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.94%
KSTBF - PMCOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUGO - PMCOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.20%
TINFF - PMCOF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
More

PUCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PUCCF and PDIYF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PUCCF and PDIYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PUCCF
1D Price
Change %
PUCCF100%
+10.86%
PDIYF - PUCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.34%
ONXGF - PUCCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.38%
PMCOF - PUCCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
TINFF - PUCCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
WRLGF - PUCCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+6.62%
More