PMCCF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
9.11M
RRDMF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
21.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMCCF vs RRDMF

Header iconPMCCF vs RRDMF Comparison
Open Charts PMCCF vs RRDMFBanner chart's image
Peloton Minerals
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$8.84K
Capitalization9.11M
Royal Road Minerals
Price$0.11
Change+$0.01 (+10.00%)
Volume$572.5K
Capitalization21.59M
PMCCF vs RRDMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMCCF vs. RRDMF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMCCF is a Hold and RRDMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (PMCCF: $0.05 vs. RRDMF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: PMCCF and RRDMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMCCF: 174% vs. RRDMF: 1319%
Market capitalization -- PMCCF: $9.11M vs. RRDMF: $21.59M
PMCCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $9.11M. RRDMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $21.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRRDMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PMCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RRDMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PMCCF and RRDMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMCCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRDMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMCCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RRDMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RRDMF is a better buy in the short-term than PMCCF.

Price Growth

PMCCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.33% price change this week, while RRDMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRDMF($21.6M) has a higher market cap than PMCCF($9.11M). PMCCF YTD gains are higher at: 16.957 vs. RRDMF (10.000). PMCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -558.87K vs. RRDMF (-6.48M). RRDMF has more cash in the bank: 16.9M vs. PMCCF (51.2K). RRDMF (96.2K) and PMCCF (100K) have identical debt. PMCCF (0) and RRDMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PMCCFRRDMFPMCCF / RRDMF
Capitalization9.11M21.6M42%
EBITDA-558.87K-6.48M9%
Gain YTD16.95710.000170%
P/E Ratio18.76N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash51.2K16.9M0%
Total Debt100K96.2K104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCCF vs RRDMF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCCF
RRDMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
697
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6288
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RRDMF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (86). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

RRDMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (100). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RRDMF (97). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than RRDMF’s over the last 12 months.

RRDMF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMCCF (81). This means that RRDMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as RRDMF (88). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew similarly to RRDMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMCCFRRDMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SZLMY51.960.59
+1.14%
Swiss Life Holding
CSOL0.01N/A
N/A
China Solar & Clean Energy Solutions, Inc.
RSGUF4.11N/A
N/A
Rogers Sugar Inc.
SHCAF5.00N/A
N/A
Sharp Corp.
MGMLF0.05N/A
-5.02%
Maple Gold Mines Ltd.

PMCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCCF and PPTA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCCF and PPTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCCF
1D Price
Change %
PMCCF100%
-10.18%
PPTA - PMCCF
27%
Poorly correlated
+8.19%
EXNRF - PMCCF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
RRDMF - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
PEXZF - PMCCF
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.90%
PDIV - PMCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RRDMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RRDMF and PMCCF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RRDMF and PMCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRDMF
1D Price
Change %
RRDMF100%
+10.00%
PMCCF - RRDMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-10.18%
RUPRF - RRDMF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
RMLFF - RRDMF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
RMGGF - RRDMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKHNF - RRDMF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More