PMCCF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
8.55M
PMNXF
Price
$2.77
Change
+$0.13 (+4.92%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PMCCF vs PMNXF

Header iconPMCCF vs PMNXF Comparison
Open Charts PMCCF vs PMNXFBanner chart's image
Peloton Minerals
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization8.55M
Perseus Mining
Price$2.77
Change+$0.13 (+4.92%)
Volume$17.58K
Capitalization3.76B
PMCCF vs PMNXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PMCCF vs. PMNXF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMCCF is a Hold and PMNXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PMCCF: $0.06 vs. PMNXF: $2.77)
Brand notoriety: PMCCF and PMNXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PMCCF: 72% vs. PMNXF: 189%
Market capitalization -- PMCCF: $8.55M vs. PMNXF: $3.76B
PMCCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.55M. PMNXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PMCCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMNXF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PMCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMNXF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMNXF is a better buy in the long-term than PMCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PMCCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMNXF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PMCCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PMNXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMNXF is a better buy in the short-term than PMCCF.

Price Growth

PMCCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PMNXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4862.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMNXF($3.76B) has a higher market cap than PMCCF($8.55M). PMCCF has higher P/E ratio than PMNXF: PMCCF (18.07) vs PMNXF (10.31). PMNXF YTD gains are higher at: 77.404 vs. PMCCF (19.891).
PMCCFPMNXFPMCCF / PMNXF
Capitalization8.55M3.76B0%
EBITDA-1.45MN/A-
Gain YTD19.89177.40426%
P/E Ratio18.0710.31175%
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash36.3KN/A-
Total Debt340KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PMCCF vs PMNXF: Fundamental Ratings
PMCCF
PMNXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2622
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10014
SMR RATING
1..100
543
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PMNXF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMCCF (89). This means that PMNXF’s stock grew significantly faster than PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMCCF (100). This means that PMNXF’s stock grew significantly faster than PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMNXF (43). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMNXF’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (57). This means that PMNXF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMCCF (61). This means that PMNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PMCCFPMNXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUFS22.190.08
+0.35%
FT Vest Laddered Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF
FIRI19.080.07
+0.34%
FIRE Funds Income Target ETF
EVSB51.010.07
+0.13%
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF
FCEF22.800.02
+0.08%
First Trust Income Opportunity ETF
FNOV51.90-0.07
-0.14%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Nov

PMCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCCF and RRDMF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCCF and RRDMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCCF
1D Price
Change %
PMCCF100%
N/A
RRDMF - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
PLMNF - PMCCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGOL - PMCCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+21.60%
PNCKF - PMCCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
PMNXF - PMCCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
More

PMNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMNXF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMNXF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMNXF
1D Price
Change %
PMNXF100%
+4.83%
TORXF - PMNXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
BTG - PMNXF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
AEM - PMNXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
NESRF - PMNXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.69%
GPTRF - PMNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.03%
More