Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBPX vs WWNPX
PMBPX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs WWNPX
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$123.37
Change+$1.96 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
PMBPX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. WWNPX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a StrongBuy and WWNPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 33.4B vs. WWNPX (1.12B). WWNPX pays higher dividends than PMBPX: WWNPX (0.07) vs PMBPX (0.01). PMBPX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: PMBPX (25 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). PMBPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. WWNPX (2.00). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: PMBPX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). WWNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.81 vs. PMBPX (9.16). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 181.10 vs. PMBPX (47.38).
| PMBPX | WWNPX | PMBPX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.64 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.66 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.018 | -9.314 | -75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.4B | 1.12B | 2,987% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.07 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.16 | 19.81 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.04 | 47.81 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.38 | 181.10 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.63 | 278.70 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement