Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBPX vs WFDRX
PMBPX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.68
Change+$0.49 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets958.06M
PMBPX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. WFDRX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a StrongBuy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. WFDRX (958M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: PMBPX (0.01) vs WFDRX (0.00). PMBPX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PMBPX (25 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). PMBPX (0.83) and WFDRX (0.82) have similar cost to investors . WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.61 vs. WFDRX (3.94). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 56.25 vs. WFDRX (-18.65).
| PMBPX | WFDRX | PMBPX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.79 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.82 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.606 | 3.385 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.2B | 958M | 3,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.61 | 3.94 | 345% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.38 | 30.30 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.25 | -18.65 | -302% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.27 | -9.95 | -1,078% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement