Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBPX vs WFDDX
PMBPX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.48
Change+$0.27 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets965.18M
PMBPX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. WFDDX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a StrongBuy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. WFDDX (965M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: PMBPX (0.01) vs WFDDX (0.00). PMBPX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PMBPX (25 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PMBPX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. WFDDX (2.93). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 59.60 vs. WFDDX (-22.14).
| PMBPX | WFDDX | PMBPX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.14 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.17 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.041 | 2.742 | 257% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3B | 965M | 3,347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.41 | 2.93 | 527% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.39 | 33.27 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.60 | -22.14 | -269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.46 | -18.91 | -552% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers