Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBPX vs WFDDX
PMBPX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$25.45
Change-$4.26 (-14.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets888.31M
PMBPX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. WFDDX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a Hold and WFDDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.3B vs. WFDDX (888M). PMBPX (0.00) and WFDDX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBPX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PMBPX (25 years) vs WFDDX (21 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PMBPX (13.70). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PMBPX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). PMBPX (-11.17) and WFDDX (-11.20) have marching annual gain over last year. PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 12.76 vs. WFDDX (-51.31).
| PMBPX | WFDDX | PMBPX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.14 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.17 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.931 | 1.800 | -163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.3B | 888M | 3,412% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.17 | -11.20 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.00 | 6.53 | 322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.76 | -51.31 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.39 | 3.71 | 3,220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement