Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBPX vs WFDAX
PMBPX vs WFDAX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs WFDAX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl A
Price$25.51
Change-$0.06 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets956.11M
PMBPX vs WFDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. WFDAX commentary
May 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a Buy and WFDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 31.6B vs. WFDAX (956M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than WFDAX: PMBPX (0.01) vs WFDAX (0.00). PMBPX was incepted earlier than WFDAX: PMBPX (24 years) vs WFDAX (18 years). WFDAX (1.24) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). WFDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDAX: PMBPX (0) vs WFDAX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.26 vs. WFDAX (-3.95). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 68.25 vs. WFDAX (-21.31).
| PMBPX | WFDAX | PMBPX / WFDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.24 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.441 | -0.662 | -671% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.6B | 956M | 3,305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.26 | -3.95 | -260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.73 | 27.61 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.25 | -21.31 | -320% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.81 | -25.69 | -369% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement