Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBPX vs WDSCX
PMBPX vs WDSCX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs WDSCX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl C
Price$17.31
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets956.11M
PMBPX vs WDSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. WDSCX commentary
May 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a Buy and WDSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 31.6B vs. WDSCX (956M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than WDSCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs WDSCX (0.00). PMBPX was incepted earlier than WDSCX: PMBPX (24 years) vs WDSCX (18 years). WDSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). WDSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WDSCX: PMBPX (0) vs WDSCX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.26 vs. WDSCX (-8.46). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 68.25 vs. WDSCX (-35.27).
| PMBPX | WDSCX | PMBPX / WDSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.96 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.99 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.441 | -0.973 | -457% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.6B | 956M | 3,305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.26 | -8.46 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.73 | 19.13 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.25 | -35.27 | -194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.81 | -45.72 | -207% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement