Ad is loading...
PMBPX vs WDSCX
PMBPX vs WDSCX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs WDSCX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl C
Price$15.07
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets846.46M
PMBPX vs WDSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. WDSCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a Buy and WDSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. WDSCX (846M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than WDSCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs WDSCX (0.00). PMBPX was incepted earlier than WDSCX: PMBPX (24 years) vs WDSCX (18 years). WDSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). WDSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WDSCX: PMBPX (0) vs WDSCX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. WDSCX (-14.67). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 61.51 vs. WDSCX (-36.60).
| PMBPX | WDSCX | PMBPX / WDSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.96 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.99 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.464 | -13.787 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 846M | 3,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | -14.67 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.81 | -14.62 | -129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.51 | -36.60 | -168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.35 | -52.42 | -151% |