Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBPX vs WDSCX
PMBPX vs WDSCX Comparison
Open Charts PMBPX vs WDSCX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl C
Price$17.95
Change+$0.26 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets958.06M
PMBPX vs WDSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBPX vs. WDSCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBPX is a StrongBuy and WDSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. WDSCX (958M). PMBPX pays higher dividends than WDSCX: PMBPX (0.01) vs WDSCX (0.00). PMBPX was incepted earlier than WDSCX: PMBPX (25 years) vs WDSCX (18 years). WDSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). WDSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WDSCX: PMBPX (0) vs WDSCX (1000). PMBPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.61 vs. WDSCX (-2.92). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 56.25 vs. WDSCX (-38.97).
| PMBPX | WDSCX | PMBPX / WDSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.96 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.99 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.606 | 2.689 | 320% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.2B | 958M | 3,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.61 | -2.92 | -466% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.38 | 18.01 | 274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.25 | -38.97 | -144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.27 | -43.91 | -244% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement