Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBMX vs WWNPX
PMBMX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts PMBMX vs WWNPX
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$123.37
Change+$1.96 (+1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
PMBMX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBMX vs. WWNPX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBMX is a StrongBuy and WWNPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. WWNPX (1.12B). WWNPX pays higher dividends than PMBMX: WWNPX (0.07) vs PMBMX (0.02). PMBMX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: PMBMX (25 years) vs WWNPX (26 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.14). PMBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. WWNPX (2.00). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: PMBMX (0) vs WWNPX (2500). WWNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.81 vs. PMBMX (8.59). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 181.10 vs. PMBMX (43.76).
| PMBMX | WWNPX | PMBMX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.64 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.66 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.781 | -9.314 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33B | 1.12B | 2,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.07 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.59 | 19.81 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.95 | 47.81 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.76 | 181.10 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.62 | 278.70 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement