Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBMX vs WMGCX
PMBMX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts PMBMX vs WMGCX
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth C
Price$18.29
Change+$0.18 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
PMBMX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBMX vs. WMGCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBMX is a StrongBuy and WMGCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. WMGCX (5.04B). PMBMX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: PMBMX (0.02) vs WMGCX (0.00). PMBMX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: PMBMX (25 years) vs WMGCX (25 years). WMGCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.14). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: PMBMX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.04 vs. WMGCX (-1.19). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 52.44 vs. WMGCX (-31.03).
| PMBMX | WMGCX | PMBMX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.79 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.98 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.421 | 6.523 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.2B | 5.04B | 659% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.04 | -1.19 | -1,097% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.27 | -9.99 | -473% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.44 | -31.03 | -169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.42 | -10.47 | -930% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement