Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBMX vs WFDRX
PMBMX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PMBMX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.68
Change+$0.49 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets958.06M
PMBMX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBMX vs. WFDRX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBMX is a StrongBuy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. WFDRX (958M). PMBMX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: PMBMX (0.02) vs WFDRX (0.00). PMBMX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PMBMX (25 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). PMBMX (1.14) is less costly to investors than WFDRX (0.82). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.04 vs. WFDRX (3.94). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 52.44 vs. WFDRX (-18.65).
| PMBMX | WFDRX | PMBMX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.79 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.82 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.421 | 3.385 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.2B | 958M | 3,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.04 | 3.94 | 331% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.27 | 30.30 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.44 | -18.65 | -281% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.42 | -9.95 | -979% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement