Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBMX vs WFDDX
PMBMX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PMBMX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$28.60
Change+$0.43 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets958.06M
PMBMX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBMX vs. WFDDX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBMX is a StrongBuy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. WFDDX (958M). PMBMX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: PMBMX (0.02) vs WFDDX (0.00). PMBMX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PMBMX (25 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) and PMBMX (1.14) have similar cost to investors . WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PMBMX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.04 vs. WFDDX (2.55). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 52.44 vs. WFDDX (-23.41).
| PMBMX | WFDDX | PMBMX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.17 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.421 | 3.175 | 265% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.2B | 958M | 3,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.04 | 2.55 | 512% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.27 | 27.51 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.44 | -23.41 | -224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.42 | -18.91 | -515% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement