Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBMX vs WFDDX
PMBMX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PMBMX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$25.45
Change-$4.26 (-14.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets888.31M
PMBMX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBMX vs. WFDDX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBMX is a Hold and WFDDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. WFDDX (888M). PMBMX (0.00) and WFDDX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBMX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PMBMX (25 years) vs WFDDX (21 years). WFDDX (1.17) and PMBMX (1.14) have similar cost to investors . WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PMBMX (13.70). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PMBMX (0) vs WFDDX (1000000). WFDDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.20 vs. PMBMX (-11.84). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 9.56 vs. WFDDX (-51.31).
| PMBMX | WFDDX | PMBMX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.17 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.987 | 1.800 | -166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.5B | 888M | 3,322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.84 | -11.20 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.93 | 6.53 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.56 | -51.31 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.34 | 3.71 | 2,922% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement