Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBMX vs WDSCX
PMBMX vs WDSCX Comparison
Open Charts PMBMX vs WDSCX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl C
Price$17.31
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets956.11M
PMBMX vs WDSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBMX vs. WDSCX commentary
May 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBMX is a Buy and WDSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 31.6B vs. WDSCX (956M). PMBMX pays higher dividends than WDSCX: PMBMX (0.02) vs WDSCX (0.00). PMBMX was incepted earlier than WDSCX: PMBMX (24 years) vs WDSCX (18 years). WDSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.14). WDSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WDSCX: PMBMX (0) vs WDSCX (1000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.70 vs. WDSCX (-8.46). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 64.11 vs. WDSCX (-35.27).
| PMBMX | WDSCX | PMBMX / WDSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.96 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.99 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.308 | -0.973 | -443% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.6B | 956M | 3,305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.70 | -8.46 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.65 | 19.13 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.11 | -35.27 | -182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.55 | -45.72 | -187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement