Ad is loading...
PMBMX vs WDSCX
PMBMX vs WDSCX Comparison
Open Charts PMBMX vs WDSCX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl C
Price$15.07
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets846.46M
PMBMX vs WDSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBMX vs. WDSCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBMX is a Buy and WDSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBMX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. WDSCX (846M). PMBMX pays higher dividends than WDSCX: PMBMX (0.02) vs WDSCX (0.00). PMBMX was incepted earlier than WDSCX: PMBMX (24 years) vs WDSCX (18 years). WDSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than PMBMX (1.14). WDSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBMX (10.50). PMBMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WDSCX: PMBMX (0) vs WDSCX (1000). PMBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. WDSCX (-14.67). PMBMX return over 5 years is better than : 57.57 vs. WDSCX (-36.60).
| PMBMX | WDSCX | PMBMX / WDSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.96 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.99 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.553 | -13.787 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 846M | 3,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.55 | -14.67 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.11 | -14.62 | -117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.57 | -36.60 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.82 | -52.42 | -135% |