Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBJX vs WWNPX
PMBJX vs WWNPX Comparison
Open Charts PMBJX vs WWNPX
Kinetics Paradigm No Load
Price$139.08
Change+$1.16 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.35B
PMBJX vs WWNPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBJX vs. WWNPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBJX is a Hold and WWNPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 30.6B vs. WWNPX (1.35B). WWNPX pays higher dividends than PMBJX: WWNPX (0.06) vs PMBJX (0.06). PMBJX was incepted earlier than WWNPX: PMBJX (24 years) vs WWNPX (25 years). WWNPX (1.66) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). PMBJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.50 vs. WWNPX (2.00). PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWNPX: PMBJX (1000) vs WWNPX (2500). WWNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.44 vs. PMBJX (10.12). WWNPX return over 5 years is better than : 206.20 vs. PMBJX (53.13).
| PMBJX | WWNPX | PMBJX / WWNPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.64 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.66 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.960 | 3.884 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.6B | 1.35B | 2,267% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.06 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | 43.44 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.96 | 82.16 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.13 | 206.20 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.94 | 290.72 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement