Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBJX vs WFDRX
PMBJX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PMBJX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.68
Change+$0.49 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets958.06M
PMBJX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBJX vs. WFDRX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBJX is a StrongBuy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 33.2B vs. WFDRX (958M). PMBJX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: PMBJX (0.06) vs WFDRX (0.00). PMBJX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PMBJX (24 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) and PMBJX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBJX (10.50). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PMBJX: WFDRX (0) vs PMBJX (1000). PMBJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.47 vs. WFDRX (3.94). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. WFDRX (-18.65).
| PMBJX | WFDRX | PMBJX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.79 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.82 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.650 | 3.385 | 256% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.2B | 958M | 3,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.47 | 3.94 | 342% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.88 | 30.30 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.02 | -18.65 | -295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.26 | -9.95 | -1,038% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement