Ad is loading...
PMBJX vs WFDDX
PMBJX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PMBJX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$23.96
Change+$0.09 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets846.46M
PMBJX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBJX vs. WFDDX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBJX is a Buy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBJX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. WFDDX (846M). PMBJX pays higher dividends than WFDDX: PMBJX (0.06) vs WFDDX (0.00). PMBJX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PMBJX (24 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). WFDDX (1.17) is less costly to investors than PMBJX (0.78). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBJX (10.50). PMBJX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PMBJX (1000) vs WFDDX (1000000). PMBJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. WFDDX (-9.86). PMBJX return over 5 years is better than : 60.33 vs. WFDDX (-20.45).
| PMBJX | WFDDX | PMBJX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.14 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.17 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.435 | -13.564 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 846M | 3,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | -9.86 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.40 | -7.67 | -240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.33 | -20.45 | -295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.90 | -31.21 | -243% |