Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBCX vs WFDRX
PMBCX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.76
Change-$1.14 (-3.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets902.57M
PMBCX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. WFDRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a Buy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. WFDRX (903M). PMBCX (0.00) and WFDRX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PMBCX (19 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than WFDRX (0.82). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PMBCX: WFDRX (0) vs PMBCX (1000). WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.78 vs. PMBCX (-6.40). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.54 vs. WFDRX (-31.74).
| PMBCX | WFDRX | PMBCX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.79 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.82 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.080 | 7.245 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32B | 903M | 3,544% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.40 | -5.78 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.70 | 30.79 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.54 | -31.74 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.64 | 4.86 | 1,599% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement