Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBCX vs WFDRX
PMBCX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.54
Change+$0.31 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets965.18M
PMBCX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. WFDRX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a StrongBuy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 32.3B vs. WFDRX (965M). PMBCX (0.00) and WFDRX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PMBCX (18 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than WFDRX (0.82). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PMBCX: WFDRX (0) vs PMBCX (1000). PMBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.57 vs. WFDRX (4.33). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 47.59 vs. WFDRX (-17.31).
| PMBCX | WFDRX | PMBCX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.79 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.82 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.553 | 2.942 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.3B | 965M | 3,347% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.57 | 4.33 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.58 | 36.21 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.59 | -17.31 | -275% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.67 | -9.91 | -763% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers