Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBCX vs WFDRX
PMBCX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$29.76
Change-$4.22 (-12.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets888.31M
PMBCX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. WFDRX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a Hold and WFDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. WFDRX (888M). PMBCX (0.00) and WFDRX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PMBCX (19 years) vs WFDRX (13 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than WFDRX (0.82). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. PMBCX (13.70). WFDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PMBCX: WFDRX (0) vs PMBCX (1000). WFDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.96 vs. PMBCX (-13.29). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.81 vs. WFDRX (-47.37).
| PMBCX | WFDRX | PMBCX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.79 | 222% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.82 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.016 | 1.848 | -163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.5B | 888M | 3,322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.29 | -8.96 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.54 | 11.04 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.81 | -47.37 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.47 | 17.40 | 497% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement