Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBCX vs WFDDX
PMBCX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$27.18
Change-$0.44 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets932.62M
PMBCX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. WFDDX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a StrongBuy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 30.6B vs. WFDDX (933M). PMBCX (0.00) and WFDDX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PMBCX (18 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than WFDDX (1.17). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PMBCX (1000) vs WFDDX (1000000). PMBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. WFDDX (-0.62). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.73 vs. WFDDX (-20.73).
| PMBCX | WFDDX | PMBCX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.14 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.17 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.538 | -1.948 | -79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.6B | 933M | 3,280% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | -0.62 | -1,468% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.85 | 34.29 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.73 | -20.73 | -206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.54 | -23.29 | -281% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement