Ad is loading...
PMBCX vs WFDDX
PMBCX vs WFDDX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs WFDDX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund -Cl Admin
Price$23.96
Change+$0.09 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets846.46M
PMBCX vs WFDDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. WFDDX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a Buy and WFDDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. WFDDX (846M). PMBCX (0.00) and WFDDX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than WFDDX: PMBCX (18 years) vs WFDDX (20 years). PMBCX (1.75) is less costly to investors than WFDDX (1.17). WFDDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDDX: PMBCX (1000) vs WFDDX (1000000). PMBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. WFDDX (-9.86). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.40 vs. WFDDX (-20.45).
| PMBCX | WFDDX | PMBCX / WFDDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.14 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.17 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.701 | -13.564 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 846M | 3,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.45 | -9.86 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.51 | -7.67 | -176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.40 | -20.45 | -242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.08 | -31.21 | -173% |