Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMBCX vs RSGFX
PMBCX vs RSGFX Comparison
Open Charts PMBCX vs RSGFX
Victory RS Select Growth C
Price$12.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.18M
PMBCX vs RSGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMBCX vs. RSGFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMBCX is a Hold and RSGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBCX has more cash in the bank: 31.6B vs. RSGFX (86.2M). PMBCX (0.00) and RSGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . PMBCX was incepted earlier than RSGFX: PMBCX (19 years) vs RSGFX (18 years). RSGFX (3.68) is less costly to investors than PMBCX (1.75). RSGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. PMBCX (10.50). PMBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGFX: PMBCX (1000) vs RSGFX (2500). RSGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.18 vs. PMBCX (-9.36). PMBCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.47 vs. RSGFX (-61.25).
| PMBCX | RSGFX | PMBCX / RSGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.18 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 3.68 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.940 | 7.634 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.6B | 86.2M | 36,659% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.36 | 1.18 | -791% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.22 | -14.69 | -178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.47 | -61.25 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.04 | -71.67 | -96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement