Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PMAQX vs WFDRX
PMAQX vs WFDRX Comparison
Open Charts PMAQX vs WFDRX
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl R6
Price$32.76
Change-$1.14 (-3.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets902.57M
PMAQX vs WFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PMAQX vs. WFDRX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PMAQX is a Buy and WFDRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. WFDRX (903M). PMAQX pays higher dividends than WFDRX: PMAQX (0.20) vs WFDRX (0.00). PMAQX was incepted earlier than WFDRX: PMAQX (9 years) vs WFDRX (12 years). WFDRX (0.82) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). WFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX (0) and WFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMAQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.55 vs. WFDRX (-5.78). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 33.63 vs. WFDRX (-31.74).
| PMAQX | WFDRX | PMAQX / WFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.79 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.82 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.092 | 7.245 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32B | 903M | 3,544% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.55 | -5.78 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.03 | 30.79 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.63 | -31.74 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers