PLXS
Price
$130.22
Change
-$3.16 (-2.37%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.53B
38 days until earnings call
TTDKF
Price
$10.25
Change
-$0.51 (-4.74%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
19.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLXS vs TTDKF

Header iconPLXS vs TTDKF Comparison
Open Charts PLXS vs TTDKFBanner chart's image
Plexus
Price$130.22
Change-$3.16 (-2.37%)
Volume$122.04K
Capitalization3.53B
TDK
Price$10.25
Change-$0.51 (-4.74%)
Volume$8.32K
Capitalization19.64B
PLXS vs TTDKF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PLXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLXS vs. TTDKF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLXS is a Hold and TTDKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (PLXS: $130.22 vs. TTDKF: $10.25)
Brand notoriety: PLXS and TTDKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLXS: 82% vs. TTDKF: 35%
Market capitalization -- PLXS: $3.53B vs. TTDKF: $19.64B
PLXS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $3.53B. TTDKF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $19.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $111.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLXS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTDKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PLXS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTDKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTDKF is a better buy in the long-term than PLXS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLXS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTDKF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLXS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TTDKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PLXS and TTDKF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PLXS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -1.99% price change this week, while TTDKF (@Electronic Components) price change was -6.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLXS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+2.02% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TTDKF($19.6B) has a higher market cap than PLXS($3.53B). PLXS has higher P/E ratio than TTDKF: PLXS (25.33) vs TTDKF (16.80). TTDKF YTD gains are higher at: -14.441 vs. PLXS (-16.782). TTDKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 446B vs. PLXS (262M). TTDKF has more cash in the bank: 752B vs. PLXS (311M). PLXS has less debt than TTDKF: PLXS (242M) vs TTDKF (687B). TTDKF has higher revenues than PLXS: TTDKF (2.13T) vs PLXS (3.97B).
PLXSTTDKFPLXS / TTDKF
Capitalization3.53B19.6B18%
EBITDA262M446B0%
Gain YTD-16.782-14.441116%
P/E Ratio25.3316.80151%
Revenue3.97B2.13T0%
Total Cash311M752B0%
Total Debt242M687B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLXS vs TTDKF: Fundamental Ratings
PLXS
TTDKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3675
SMR RATING
1..100
653
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6692
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTDKF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLXS (62) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLXS’s over the last 12 months.

PLXS's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTDKF (75) in the null industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLXS (65) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLXS’s over the last 12 months.

PLXS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTDKF (58) in the null industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew similarly to TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

PLXS's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTDKF (92) in the null industry. This means that PLXS’s stock grew similarly to TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLXSTTDKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVLVX14.08-0.11
-0.78%
Cullen Value I
AFVLX21.92-0.29
-1.31%
Applied Finance Select Investor
JAGIX72.47-0.98
-1.33%
Janus Henderson Growth And Income T
FMPTX27.48-0.37
-1.33%
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value M
PROVX18.98-0.29
-1.50%
Provident Trust Strategy

PLXS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLXS has been closely correlated with SANM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLXS jumps, then SANM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLXS
1D Price
Change %
PLXS100%
-2.37%
SANM - PLXS
76%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
CTS - PLXS
74%
Closely correlated
-3.24%
BHE - PLXS
73%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
KN - PLXS
70%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
BELFB - PLXS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
More

TTDKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTDKF has been loosely correlated with TTDKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTDKF jumps, then TTDKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTDKF
1D Price
Change %
TTDKF100%
-4.73%
TTDKY - TTDKF
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.98%
APELF - TTDKF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APH - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
OLED - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
PLXS - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
More