PLSQF
Price
$34.15
Change
+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.59B
SPXCY
Price
$21.74
Change
+$0.13 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
7.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLSQF vs SPXCY

Header iconPLSQF vs SPXCY Comparison
Open Charts PLSQF vs SPXCYBanner chart's image
Plus500
Price$34.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization1.59B
Singapore Exchange
Price$21.74
Change+$0.13 (+0.60%)
Volume$4.63K
Capitalization7.76B
PLSQF vs SPXCY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SPXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLSQF vs. SPXCY commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLSQF is a Hold and SPXCY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (PLSQF: $34.15 vs. SPXCY: $21.74)
Brand notoriety: PLSQF and SPXCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLSQF: 100% vs. SPXCY: 19%
Market capitalization -- PLSQF: $1.59B vs. SPXCY: $7.76B
PLSQF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.59B. SPXCY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLSQF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSPXCY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PLSQF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SPXCY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLSQF is a better buy in the long-term than SPXCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SPXCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SPXCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PLSQF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SPXCY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +96.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXCY($7.76B) has a higher market cap than PLSQF($1.59B). SPXCY has higher P/E ratio than PLSQF: SPXCY (20.53) vs PLSQF (5.08). SPXCY YTD gains are higher at: 18.259 vs. PLSQF (8.502). SPXCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 724M vs. PLSQF (495M). SPXCY has higher revenues than PLSQF: SPXCY (1.15B) vs PLSQF (833M).
PLSQFSPXCYPLSQF / SPXCY
Capitalization1.59B7.76B20%
EBITDA495M724M68%
Gain YTD8.50218.25947%
P/E Ratio5.0820.5325%
Revenue833M1.15B72%
Total Cash936MN/A-
Total Debt5.6MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLSQF vs SPXCY: Fundamental Ratings
PLSQF
SPXCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
1827
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2224
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLSQF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPXCY (80). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPXCY’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSQF (4). This means that SPXCY’s stock grew similarly to PLSQF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCY (27). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew similarly to SPXCY’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSQF (48). This means that SPXCY’s stock grew similarly to PLSQF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCY (24). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew similarly to SPXCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPXCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMIIX7.08-0.06
-0.84%
BNY Mellon Income Stock I
MRGGX41.01-0.57
-1.37%
MFS Core Equity R1
SCVJX34.69-0.54
-1.53%
Allspring Small Company Value R6
PMDDX17.85-0.28
-1.54%
Principal Small-MidCap Dividend Inc C
GNXAX14.04-0.30
-2.09%
AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation A

PLSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSQF and OTCM have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSQF and OTCM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSQF
1D Price
Change %
PLSQF100%
N/A
OTCM - PLSQF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
SPXCF - PLSQF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
SPXCY - PLSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
TMXXF - PLSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
DEFT - PLSQF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
More

SPXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPXCY and OPY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPXCY and OPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXCY
1D Price
Change %
SPXCY100%
+0.60%
OPY - SPXCY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
HKXCY - SPXCY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
NZSTF - SPXCY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPXGY - SPXCY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
SPXCF - SPXCY
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
More