PLSQF
Price
$34.15
Change
+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.92B
QMCI
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
14.72M
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLSQF vs QMCI

Header iconPLSQF vs QMCI Comparison
Open Charts PLSQF vs QMCIBanner chart's image
Plus500
Price$34.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization2.92B
QuoteMedia
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.7K
Capitalization14.72M
PLSQF vs QMCI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PLSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QMCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLSQF vs. QMCI commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLSQF is a Buy and QMCI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PLSQF: $33.09 vs. QMCI: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: PLSQF and QMCI are both not notable
PLSQF represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while QMCI is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLSQF: 100% vs. QMCI: 16%
Market capitalization -- PLSQF: $2.92B vs. QMCI: $14.72M
PLSQF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.92B. QMCI’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $14.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $164.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLSQF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileQMCI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PLSQF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • QMCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLSQF is a better buy in the long-term than QMCI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLSQF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QMCI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLSQF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • QMCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QMCI is a better buy in the short-term than PLSQF.

Price Growth

PLSQF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QMCI (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.22%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

QMCI is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.73% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.40% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLSQF($2.92B) has a higher market cap than QMCI($14.7M). QMCI has higher P/E ratio than PLSQF: QMCI (109.32) vs PLSQF (9.90). QMCI YTD gains are higher at: 18.013 vs. PLSQF (8.502). QMCI has less debt than PLSQF: QMCI (85.2K) vs PLSQF (15.8M).
PLSQFQMCIPLSQF / QMCI
Capitalization2.92B14.7M19,891%
EBITDAN/A994K-
Gain YTD8.50218.01347%
P/E Ratio9.90109.329%
RevenueN/A19.1M-
Total CashN/A414K-
Total Debt15.8M85.2K18,545%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLSQF vs QMCI: Fundamental Ratings
PLSQF
QMCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
482
SMR RATING
1..100
20100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2510
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLSQF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QMCI (79). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QMCI’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QMCI (82). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew significantly faster than QMCI’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QMCI (100). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew significantly faster than QMCI’s over the last 12 months.

PLSQF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as QMCI (59). This means that PLSQF’s stock grew similarly to QMCI’s over the last 12 months.

QMCI's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSQF (25). This means that QMCI’s stock grew similarly to PLSQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLSQFQMCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLSQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QMCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMXAX19.440.10
+0.52%
SEI Extended Market Index A (SIIT)
CWGCX72.210.33
+0.46%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc C
EKGYX40.790.04
+0.10%
Allspring Special Global Small Cap Admin
MBINX32.05-0.05
-0.16%
NYLI Balanced Investor Class
BASMX29.57-0.06
-0.20%
iShares Total US Stock Market Idx Inv A

PLSQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSQF and OTCM have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSQF and OTCM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSQF
1D Price
Change %
PLSQF100%
N/A
OTCM - PLSQF
17%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
SPXCF - PLSQF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
SPXCY - PLSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
TMXXF - PLSQF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DEFT - PLSQF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
More

QMCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QMCI and SPXCF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QMCI and SPXCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QMCI
1D Price
Change %
QMCI100%
N/A
SPXCF - QMCI
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
OTCM - QMCI
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
SPXCY - QMCI
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
PLSQF - QMCI
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSCUF - QMCI
-3%
Poorly correlated
+6.48%
More