PLSDF
Price
$2.47
Change
+$0.15 (+6.47%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
82.4M
POFCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.03 (-33.33%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
527.39M
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLSDF vs POFCF

Header iconPLSDF vs POFCF Comparison
Open Charts PLSDF vs POFCFBanner chart's image
Pulse Seismic
Price$2.47
Change+$0.15 (+6.47%)
Volume$53.75K
Capitalization82.4M
Petrofac
Price$0.06
Change-$0.03 (-33.33%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization527.39M
PLSDF vs POFCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POFCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLSDF vs. POFCF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLSDF is a Hold and POFCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PLSDF: $2.47 vs. POFCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: PLSDF and POFCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLSDF: 694% vs. POFCF: 107%
Market capitalization -- PLSDF: $82.4M vs. POFCF: $527.39M
PLSDF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $82.4M. POFCF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $527.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLSDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePOFCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PLSDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • POFCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLSDF is a better buy in the long-term than POFCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLSDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POFCF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLSDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • POFCF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, POFCF is a better buy in the short-term than PLSDF.

Price Growth

PLSDF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +10.90% price change this week, while POFCF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

POFCF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.50% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
POFCF($527M) has a higher market cap than PLSDF($82.4M). PLSDF YTD gains are higher at: 48.976 vs. POFCF (-54.545). POFCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29M vs. PLSDF (14.9M). POFCF has more cash in the bank: 430M vs. PLSDF (9.69M). PLSDF has less debt than POFCF: PLSDF (327K) vs POFCF (1.01B). POFCF has higher revenues than PLSDF: POFCF (2.69B) vs PLSDF (21.8M).
PLSDFPOFCFPLSDF / POFCF
Capitalization82.4M527M16%
EBITDA14.9M29M51%
Gain YTD48.976-54.545-90%
P/E Ratio39.84N/A-
Revenue21.8M2.69B1%
Total Cash9.69M430M2%
Total Debt327K1.01B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLSDF vs POFCF: Fundamental Ratings
PLSDF
POFCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26100
SMR RATING
1..100
1796
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3891
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2216
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLSDF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as POFCF (56). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew similarly to POFCF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for POFCF (100). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than POFCF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for POFCF (96). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than POFCF’s over the last 12 months.

PLSDF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POFCF (91). This means that PLSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than POFCF’s over the last 12 months.

POFCF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as PLSDF (22). This means that POFCF’s stock grew similarly to PLSDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLSDFPOFCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POFCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGKRX28.990.41
+1.43%
PGIM Jennison Technology R6
PPNMX10.780.11
+1.03%
Principal SmallCap Growth I R3
UBVLX85.490.49
+0.58%
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val L
JHAIX10.550.04
+0.38%
JHancock Multi-Asset Absolute Return I
IARFX16.930.04
+0.24%
Invesco Real Estate R6

PLSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSDF and GZPZF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSDF and GZPZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSDF
1D Price
Change %
PLSDF100%
+6.59%
GZPZF - PLSDF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - PLSDF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
POFCF - PLSDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGHAF - PLSDF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSFDF - PLSDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-6.88%
More

POFCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POFCF has been loosely correlated with POFCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POFCF jumps, then POFCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POFCF
1D Price
Change %
POFCF100%
N/A
POFCY - POFCF
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HNTIF - POFCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLSDF - POFCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+6.59%
HGHAF - POFCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - POFCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More