PLMNF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.25M
PNCKF
Price
$0.36
Change
-$0.02 (-5.26%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
26.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLMNF vs PNCKF

Header iconPLMNF vs PNCKF Comparison
Open Charts PLMNF vs PNCKFBanner chart's image
Palamina
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization7.25M
Galleon Gold
Price$0.36
Change-$0.02 (-5.26%)
Volume$31.07K
Capitalization26.38M
PLMNF vs PNCKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PLMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNCKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLMNF vs. PNCKF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLMNF is a Buy and PNCKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (PLMNF: $0.11 vs. PNCKF: $0.36)
Brand notoriety: PLMNF and PNCKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLMNF: 3% vs. PNCKF: 69%
Market capitalization -- PLMNF: $7.25M vs. PNCKF: $26.38M
PLMNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.25M. PNCKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $26.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLMNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNCKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PLMNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNCKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLMNF is a better buy in the long-term than PNCKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLMNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNCKF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLMNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PNCKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLMNF is a better buy in the short-term than PNCKF.

Price Growth

PLMNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +17.31% price change this week, while PNCKF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +26.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6061.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.03% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNCKF($26.4M) has a higher market cap than PLMNF($7.25M). PNCKF YTD gains are higher at: 201.681 vs. PLMNF (54.539). PNCKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -546.41K vs. PLMNF (-3.21M). PNCKF has more cash in the bank: 906K vs. PLMNF (52.8K). PLMNF (0) and PNCKF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PLMNFPNCKFPLMNF / PNCKF
Capitalization7.25M26.4M27%
EBITDA-3.21M-546.41K588%
Gain YTD54.539201.68127%
P/E Ratio10.38N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash52.8K906K6%
Total DebtN/A3.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLMNF vs PNCKF: Fundamental Ratings
PLMNF
PNCKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
785
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNCKF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as PLMNF (67). This means that PNCKF’s stock grew similarly to PLMNF’s over the last 12 months.

PNCKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PLMNF (100). This means that PNCKF’s stock grew similarly to PLMNF’s over the last 12 months.

PNCKF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as PLMNF (100). This means that PNCKF’s stock grew similarly to PLMNF’s over the last 12 months.

PNCKF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PLMNF (39). This means that PNCKF’s stock grew similarly to PLMNF’s over the last 12 months.

PLMNF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PNCKF (85). This means that PLMNF’s stock grew significantly faster than PNCKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLMNFPNCKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNCKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USEG1.250.05
+4.17%
US Energy Corp
BRY4.000.07
+1.78%
Berry Corp
LZB34.33-0.03
-0.09%
La-Z-Boy
FR51.13-0.72
-1.39%
First Industrial Realty Trust
MS157.88-2.88
-1.79%
Morgan Stanley

PLMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLMNF and GRLGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLMNF and GRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMNF
1D Price
Change %
PLMNF100%
-0.27%
GRLGF - PLMNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCCF - PLMNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+7.08%
PNCKF - PLMNF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-5.50%
PGOL - PLMNF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
PMNXF - PLMNF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More

PNCKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNCKF and TROYF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNCKF and TROYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNCKF
1D Price
Change %
PNCKF100%
-5.50%
TROYF - PNCKF
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.76%
PMNXF - PNCKF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
NCAUF - PNCKF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCCF - PNCKF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+7.08%
PLMNF - PNCKF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
More