PLMNF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.02M
PMCCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLMNF vs PMCCF

Header iconPLMNF vs PMCCF Comparison
Open Charts PLMNF vs PMCCFBanner chart's image
Palamina
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization8.02M
Peloton Minerals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization8.02M
PLMNF vs PMCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PLMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLMNF vs. PMCCF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLMNF is a Buy and PMCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PLMNF: $0.11 vs. PMCCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: PLMNF and PMCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLMNF: 256% vs. PMCCF: 4%
Market capitalization -- PLMNF: $8.02M vs. PMCCF: $8.02M
PLMNF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.02M. PMCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLMNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PLMNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMCCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCCF is a better buy in the long-term than PLMNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLMNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLMNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PMCCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLMNF is a better buy in the short-term than PMCCF.

Price Growth

PLMNF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +16.53% price change this week, while PMCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLMNF($8.02M) and PMCCF($8.02M) have the same market capitalization . PMCCF has higher P/E ratio than PLMNF: PMCCF (14.97) vs PLMNF (10.38). PLMNF YTD gains are higher at: 55.243 vs. PMCCF (30.217). PMCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.45M vs. PLMNF (-3.21M). PLMNF has more cash in the bank: 52.8K vs. PMCCF (36.3K). PLMNF (0) and PMCCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PLMNFPMCCFPLMNF / PMCCF
Capitalization8.02M8.02M100%
EBITDA-3.21M-1.45M221%
Gain YTD55.24330.217183%
P/E Ratio10.3814.9769%
Revenue00-
Total Cash52.8K36.3K145%
Total DebtN/A340K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLMNF vs PMCCF: Fundamental Ratings
PLMNF
PMCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3687
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1005
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
810
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLMNF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (89). This means that PLMNF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PLMNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (100). This means that PLMNF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLMNF (100). This means that PMCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PLMNF’s over the last 12 months.

PLMNF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (55). This means that PLMNF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PLMNF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCCF (10). This means that PLMNF’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLMNFPMCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HTCO7.960.18
+2.31%
High-Trend International Group
UFPT193.543.50
+1.84%
UFP Technologies
LNW84.930.27
+0.32%
Light & Wonder
GOOG247.180.61
+0.25%
Alphabet
CUB10.50N/A
N/A
Lionheart Holdings

PLMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLMNF and GRLGF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLMNF and GRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMNF
1D Price
Change %
PLMNF100%
N/A
GRLGF - PLMNF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMCCF - PLMNF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNCKF - PLMNF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGOL - PLMNF
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMNXF - PLMNF
-6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PMCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCCF and RRDMF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCCF and RRDMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCCF
1D Price
Change %
PMCCF100%
N/A
RRDMF - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMNF - PMCCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGOL - PMCCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNCKF - PMCCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMNXF - PMCCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More