PLMIU
Price
$10.89
Change
+$1.19 (+12.27%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SREDF
Price
$10.75
Change
-$0.62 (-5.45%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
5.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLMIU vs SREDF

Header iconPLMIU vs SREDF Comparison
Open Charts PLMIU vs SREDFBanner chart's image
Plum Acquisition
Price$10.89
Change+$1.19 (+12.27%)
Volume$2.5K
CapitalizationN/A
StoreBrand ASA
Price$10.75
Change-$0.62 (-5.45%)
Volume$568
Capitalization5.76B
PLMIU vs SREDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLMIU vs. SREDF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLMIU is a StrongBuy and SREDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (PLMIU: $10.89 vs. SREDF: $10.75)
Brand notoriety: PLMIU and SREDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLMIU: 100% vs. SREDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- PLMIU: $0 vs. SREDF: $5.76B
PLMIU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. SREDF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $5.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLMIU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSREDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PLMIU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SREDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SREDF is a better buy in the long-term than PLMIU.

Price Growth

PLMIU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SREDF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.17% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLMIU YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SREDF (-3.932). SREDF has more cash in the bank: 18.1B vs. PLMIU (94.7K). PLMIU has less debt than SREDF: PLMIU (1.25M) vs SREDF (54.9B). SREDF has higher revenues than PLMIU: SREDF (42.7B) vs PLMIU (0).
PLMIUSREDFPLMIU / SREDF
CapitalizationN/A5.76B-
EBITDA725KN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-3.932-
P/E RatioN/A8.49-
Revenue042.7B-
Total Cash94.7K18.1B0%
Total Debt1.25M54.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SREDF: Fundamental Ratings
SREDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INTR7.06-0.06
-0.84%
Inter & Co
GRAB4.57-0.06
-1.30%
Grab Holdings Limited
OM19.96-0.32
-1.58%
Outset Medical Inc
MBIO1.17-0.10
-7.87%
Mustang Bio Inc
LNZA0.27-0.03
-9.27%
LanzaTech Global

PLMIU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMIU has been loosely correlated with KACUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMIU jumps, then KACUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMIU
1D Price
Change %
PLMIU100%
N/A
KACUF - PLMIU
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WELNF - PLMIU
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASUUF - PLMIU
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALSUF - PLMIU
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SREDF - PLMIU
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SREDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SREDF and PLMIU have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SREDF and PLMIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SREDF
1D Price
Change %
SREDF100%
N/A
PLMIU - SREDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DHCC - SREDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-17.87%
KACLF - SREDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - SREDF
6%
Poorly correlated
-10.00%
STJO - SREDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More