PLLWF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
15.17M
RSCF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
6.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLLWF vs RSCF

Header iconPLLWF vs RSCF Comparison
Open Charts PLLWF vs RSCFBanner chart's image
Polarean Imaging
Price$0.01
Change-$0.01 (-50.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization15.17M
Reflect Scientific
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13.16K
Capitalization6.11M
PLLWF vs RSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLLWF vs. RSCF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLLWF is a Hold and RSCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (PLLWF: $0.01 vs. RSCF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: PLLWF and RSCF are both not notable
PLLWF represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while RSCF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLLWF: 100% vs. RSCF: 46%
Market capitalization -- PLLWF: $15.17M vs. RSCF: $6.11M
PLLWF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $15.17M. RSCF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $6.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $229.31B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $172.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.55B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $11.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLLWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRSCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PLLWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RSCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSCF is a better buy in the long-term than PLLWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSCF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RSCF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

PLLWF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RSCF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -4.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +7.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.22%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+7.68% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.19% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLLWF($15.2M) has a higher market cap than RSCF($6.11M). RSCF YTD gains are higher at: 69.762 vs. PLLWF (-26.667).
PLLWFRSCFPLLWF / RSCF
Capitalization15.2M6.11M249%
EBITDAN/A8.86K-
Gain YTD-26.66769.762-38%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A1.72M-
Total CashN/A1.03M-
Total DebtN/A197K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLLWF vs RSCF: Fundamental Ratings
PLLWF
RSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1655
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
9791
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1003
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLLWF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RSCF (71). This means that PLLWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RSCF’s over the last 12 months.

RSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as PLLWF (100). This means that RSCF’s stock grew similarly to PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.

RSCF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PLLWF (97). This means that RSCF’s stock grew similarly to PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.

RSCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLLWF (85). This means that RSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.

RSCF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLLWF (100). This means that RSCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PLLWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLLWFRSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GOOS11.340.21
+1.89%
Canada Goose Holdings
ISSC13.680.17
+1.26%
Innovative Solutions and Support
GLBE30.810.21
+0.69%
Global-E Online Ltd
MURA1.76-0.01
-0.56%
Mural Oncology plc
CTAS216.55-4.36
-1.97%
Cintas Corp

PLLWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLLWF and RYLPF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLLWF and RYLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLLWF
1D Price
Change %
PLLWF100%
N/A
RYLPF - PLLWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSCF - PLLWF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
NVYTF - PLLWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OCPNF - PLLWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCHM - PLLWF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSCF and MXCT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSCF and MXCT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSCF
1D Price
Change %
RSCF100%
+0.42%
MXCT - RSCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
BRSYF - RSCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSMDF - RSCF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYLPF - RSCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFGTF - RSCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More