PLL
Price
$6.06
Change
-$0.17 (-2.73%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
256.53M
47 days until earnings call
SGML
Price
$5.02
Change
-$0.11 (-2.14%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.54B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLL vs SGML

Header iconPLL vs SGML Comparison
Open Charts PLL vs SGMLBanner chart's image
Piedmont Lithium
Price$6.06
Change-$0.17 (-2.73%)
Volume$163.13K
Capitalization256.53M
Sigma Lithium
Price$5.02
Change-$0.11 (-2.14%)
Volume$1.62M
Capitalization1.54B
PLL vs SGML Comparison Chart
Loading...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLL vs. SGML commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLL is a Hold and SGML is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (PLL: $6.06 vs. SGML: $5.02)
Brand notoriety: PLL and SGML are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLL: 69% vs. SGML: 119%
Market capitalization -- PLL: $256.53M vs. SGML: $1.54B
PLL [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $256.53M. SGML’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGML’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PLL and SGML are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGML’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SGML’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGML is a better buy in the short-term than PLL.

Price Growth

PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.73% price change this week, while SGML (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

SGML is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGML($1.54B) has a higher market cap than PLL($257M). PLL YTD gains are higher at: -30.664 vs. SGML (-55.258). PLL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -18.36M vs. SGML (-82.05M). PLL has more cash in the bank: 72.2M vs. SGML (38.1M). PLL has less debt than SGML: PLL (1.57M) vs SGML (157M). SGML has higher revenues than PLL: SGML (130M) vs PLL (39.8M).
PLLSGMLPLL / SGML
Capitalization257M1.54B17%
EBITDA-18.36M-82.05M22%
Gain YTD-30.664-55.25855%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue39.8M130M31%
Total Cash72.2M38.1M190%
Total Debt1.57M157M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLL vs SGML: Fundamental Ratings
PLL
SGML
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
9496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8996
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10018
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLL's Valuation (27) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGML (88) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that SGML’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's SMR Rating (94) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as SGML (96) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to SGML’s over the last 12 months.

PLL's Price Growth Rating (89) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as SGML (96) in the null industry. This means that PLL’s stock grew similarly to SGML’s over the last 12 months.

SGML's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLL (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that SGML’s stock grew significantly faster than PLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLLSGML
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGML
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSHAX11.490.06
+0.52%
NYLI Cushing® MLP Premier Class A
BSCUX32.42N/A
N/A
Baron Small Cap R6
FTHMX25.49N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Eq Inst
RIRHX75.02-0.54
-0.71%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R5E
HDMBX14.13-0.20
-1.40%
Hartford Small Company HLS IB

PLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLL has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLL jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLL
1D Price
Change %
PLL100%
-2.73%
LAC - PLL
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
LAR - PLL
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
SGML - PLL
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
SLI - PLL
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
BHP - PLL
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.53%
More

SGML and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGML
1D Price
Change %
SGML100%
-2.14%
LAR - SGML
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
LAC - SGML
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
SCCO - SGML
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
FCX - SGML
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
TECK - SGML
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
More