PLGDF
Price
$1.40
Change
+$0.07 (+5.26%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
79.18M
WRLGF
Price
$0.71
Change
-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
277.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PLGDF vs WRLGF

Header iconPLGDF vs WRLGF Comparison
Open Charts PLGDF vs WRLGFBanner chart's image
PALISADES GOLD
Price$1.40
Change+$0.07 (+5.26%)
Volume$83.02K
Capitalization79.18M
WEST RED LAKE GOLD MINES
Price$0.71
Change-$0.01 (-1.39%)
Volume$940.15K
Capitalization277.85M
PLGDF vs WRLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PLGDF vs. WRLGF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PLGDF is a Buy and WRLGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PLGDF: $1.40 vs. WRLGF: $0.71)
Brand notoriety: PLGDF and WRLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PLGDF: 487% vs. WRLGF: 136%
Market capitalization -- PLGDF: $79.18M vs. WRLGF: $277.85M
PLGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $79.18M. WRLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $277.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PLGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWRLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PLGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WRLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PLGDF is a better buy in the long-term than WRLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PLGDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRLGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PLGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WRLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLGDF is a better buy in the short-term than WRLGF.

Price Growth

PLGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +16.67% price change this week, while WRLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRLGF($278M) has a higher market cap than PLGDF($79.2M). PLGDF YTD gains are higher at: 87.006 vs. WRLGF (69.048).
PLGDFWRLGFPLGDF / WRLGF
Capitalization79.2M278M28%
EBITDAN/A-79.23M-
Gain YTD87.00669.048126%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A23.7M-
Total DebtN/A97.1M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PLGDFWRLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABLZF70.85N/A
N/A
ABB Ltd.
BPPPF25.10N/A
N/A
Bid Corp Ltd
DURYY5.58N/A
N/A
Durr AG
SEAC4.18N/A
N/A
SeaChange International, Inc.
TSKFF0.94N/A
N/A
Talisker Resources Ltd.

PLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLGDF and STLRF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLGDF and STLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLGDF
1D Price
Change %
PLGDF100%
N/A
STLRF - PLGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVGLF - PLGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCEKF - PLGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRLGF - PLGDF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TROYF - PLGDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WRLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WRLGF has been loosely correlated with KNTNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WRLGF jumps, then KNTNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRLGF
1D Price
Change %
WRLGF100%
N/A
KNTNF - WRLGF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WDOFF - WRLGF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TORXF - WRLGF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGDTF - WRLGF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAGGF - WRLGF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More